|
Smith Faculty
Opinion Article
|
May 30,
2008
|
|
By Dr. Peter Morici, Professor of
International Business
E-MAIL
WEB SITE
|
 |
Extending Fed
Discount Window to Securities Dealers
Would Destabilize Markets
Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Kohn
has floated the idea of giving Wall
Street securities firms permanent access
to Federal Reserve loans conditional on
imposing greater regulatory oversight.
While temporary Fed lending to these
firms has helped stabilized markets
during the subprime meltdown, longer
term moral hazard has been established
by creating expectations that both the
Wall Street banks and primary securities
deals may rely in the future on big Fed
bailouts.
Federal supervision of the large New
York banks failed to curtail abuses of
structured investment vehicles, credit
default swaps, and other highly
engineered products that caused the
crisis. No one should expect that
extending the same regulatory oversight
to the primary dealers in U.S.
government securities would have any
greater effect on their conduct than it
has had on U.S. banks.
So far the Federal Reserve has not
extracted improvements in the quality of
business practices at New York banks in
exchange for the huge special lending
facilities it has provided. Wall Street
executives continue to prowl for
lucrative opportunities in outside
business lending and mortgage markets
rather than create more transparent
collateralized debt obligations that
would restore liquidity to adequate
levels for business lending and home
building.
Further, we saw proof this week in
deepening habits of deceit. Citigroup,
J.P. Morgan Chase and others have been
understating by wide margins their
borrowing costs for Libor calculations.
This deliberate pattern disguises the
falling confidence knowledgeable credit
market players have about the strength,
solvency and integrity of these
institutions.
The large banks and securities
dealers have demonstrated by their
actions and the costs their flawed
business practices have imposed on
shareholders, creditors and creditor
customers that current public regulation
is inadequate, and that they are
incapable of self regulation. The
government regulation has failed,
private regulation has failed, and the
market is too confused by false and
misleading information supplied by the
banks to fill the void.
Extending the discount window or
other Federal Reserve facilities to the
securities companies without addressing
these serious gaps in regulatory
oversight would only increase the
probability of arrogant abuse, further
proliferation of shoddy lending and
securitization practices, and future
credit market crises.
Before the Fed throws away any more
of the taxpayer money under girthing
Citigroup and others, it should begin to
take more seriously its regulator role
and condition its largess on real
reforms in business practices.
Peter Morici is a professor at the
University of Maryland School of
Business and former Chief Economist at
the U.S. International Trade Commission. ►More Faculty
Opinion Articles |