forthcoming Journal of Finance, 1998
We show that the incentives to reorganize inefficient firms and redeploy their assets depend on the change in industry output and industry characteristics. We use plant-level data to investigate the productivity of Chapter 11 bankrupt firms and asset-sale and closure decisions. We find no evidence of bankruptcy costs in industries with declining output growth, where most bankruptcies occur. In declining industries, bankrupt firms' plants are not less productive than industry averages and do not decline in productivity while in Chapter 11. In these industries, Chapter 11 appears to be a mechanism for fostering exit of capacity. In high-growth industries, there is some limited evidence of productivity declines while in Chapter 11 for a subsample of firms that remain in Chapter 11 for four or more years. Examining asset sales and closures by bankrupt firms and their competitors, we find that Chapter 11 status is of limited importance in predicting these decisions once industry and plant characteristics are taken into account. More generally, the findings imply that Chapter 11 may involve few real economic costs, and that industry effects and sample selection issues are very important in evaluating the performance of bankrupt firms.
*University of Maryland College of Business and Management
FirstDraft 3/23/95
This Version 10/19/96
Comments Welcome
Correspondence to: Gordon Phillips. College of Business, University of Maryland. College Park,
MD. 20742, USA, (301) 405-0347.
Click here
to download an Adobe pdf version of the paper. Size PDF format 1.053 Mb.
Click here
to download a postscript copy of the working paper. Size Postscript 5.918 Mb.